# Cold Relativistic Fluid Model

An alternate to the representation of the plasma as macroparticles, is the cold relativistic fluid model. The cold relativistic fluid model is typically faster to compute than particles and useful to replace particles when kinetic effects are negligible. This can be done for certain parts of the plasma, such as the background plasma, while still representing particle beams as a group of macroparticles. The two models then couple through Maxwell’s equations.

In the cold limit (zero internal temperature and pressure) of a relativistic plasma, the Maxwell-Fluid
equations govern the plasma evolution. The fluid equations per species, `s`

, are given by,

Where the fields are updated via Maxwell’s equations,

The fluids are coupled to the fields through,

where the particle quantities are calculated by the PIC algorithm.

## Implementation details

The fluid timeloop is embedded inside the standard PIC timeloop and consists of the following steps: 1. Higuera and Cary push of the momentum 2. Non-inertial (momentum source) terms (only in cylindrical geometry) 3. boundary conditions and MPI Communications 4. MUSCL scheme for advection terms 5. Current and Charge Deposition. The figure here gives a visual representation of these steps, and we describe each of these in more detail.

- Step 0:
**Preparation** Before the fluid loop begins, it is assumed that the program is in the state where fields \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) are available integer timestep. The fluids themselves are represented by arrays of fluid quantities (density and momentum density, \(\mathbf{Q} \equiv \{ N, NU_x, NU_y, NU_z \}\)) known on a nodal grid and at half-integer timestep.

- Step 1:
**Higuera and Cary Push** The time staggering of the fields is used by the momentum source term, which is solved with a the Higeura and Cary push (Higuera et al, 2017). We do not adopt spatial grid staggering, all discretized fluid quantities exist on the nodal grid. External fields can be included at this step.

- Step 2:
**Non-inertial Terms** In RZ, the divergence of the flux terms has additional non-zero elements outside of the derivatives. These terms are Strang split and are time integrated via equation 2.18 from (Osher et al, 1988), which is the SSP-RK3 integrator.

- Step 3:
**Boundary Conditions and Communications** At this point, the code applies boundary conditions (assuming Neumann boundary conditions for the fluid quantities) and exchanges guard cells between MPI ranks in preparation of derivative terms in the next step.

- Step 4:
**Advective Push** For the advective term, a MUSCL scheme with a low-diffusion minmod slope limiting is used. We further simplify the conservative equations in terms of primitive variables, \(\{ N, U_x, U_y, U_z \}\). Which we found to be more stable than conservative variables for the MUSCL reconstruction. Details of the scheme can be found here (Van Leer et al, 1984).

- Step 5:
**Current and Charge Deposition** Once this series of steps is complete and the fluids have been evolved by an entire timestep, the current and charge is deposited onto the grid and added to the total current and charge densities.

Note

The algorithm is safe with zero fluid density.

It also implements a positivity limiter on the density to prevent negative density regions from forming.

There is currently no ability to perform azimuthal mode decomposition in RZ.

Mesh refinement is not supported for the fluids.

The implemented MUSCL scheme has a simplifed slope averaging, see the extended writeup for details.

More details on the precise implementation are available here, WarpX_Cold_Rel_Fluids.pdf.

Warning

If using the fluid model with the Kinetic-Fluid Hybrid model or the electrostatic solver, there is a known issue that the fluids deposit at a half-timestep offset in the charge-density.

Higuera, Adam V., and John R. Cary. “Structure-preserving second-order integration of relativistic charged particle trajectories in electromagnetic fields.” Physics of Plasmas 24.5 (2017).

Osher, Stanley, and Chi-Wang Shu. “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes.” J. Comput. Phys 77.2 (1988): 439-471.

Van Leer, Bram. “On the relation between the upwind-differencing schemes of Godunov, Engquist–Osher and Roe.” SIAM Journal on Scientific and statistical Computing 5.1 (1984): 1-20.